24.4.07
All photos LoC.
Image data can be found
by pasting the image file#
blogger/5830/22/1600/3c01261v-det.jpginto the Searching Numbers engine
blogger/5830/22/1600/3c01261v-det.jpg
28.3.07
from Matt Haughey:
If you re-read the LoC stuff, they simply "request the courtesy of a
credit", meaning, nothing is required by law.
Public Domain by definition means there is absolutely no owner, and
anyone can do anything they want with it. I've seen numerous Project
Gutenberg mirrors and spin-offs, thanks to everything being Public
Domain there.
I worked at the Creative Commons for four years, I helped launch the
movement and worked closely with Lawrence Lessig to make up the
licenses. I'm well-versed on the law.
The bottom line is that while it'd be nice if the guy mentioned the
source, he doesn't legally have to do anything, and it appears he
doesn't mention them, which isn't breaking any law.
Matt
-
If you re-read the LoC stuff, they simply "request the courtesy of a
credit", meaning, nothing is required by law.
Public Domain by definition means there is absolutely no owner, and
anyone can do anything they want with it. I've seen numerous Project
Gutenberg mirrors and spin-offs, thanks to everything being Public
Domain there.
I worked at the Creative Commons for four years, I helped launch the
movement and worked closely with Lawrence Lessig to make up the
licenses. I'm well-versed on the law.
The bottom line is that while it'd be nice if the guy mentioned the
source, he doesn't legally have to do anything, and it appears he
doesn't mention them, which isn't breaking any law.
Matt
-
With all due respect Matt, what the fuck does the law have to do with anything?
"Public Domain by definition means there is absolutely no owner, and
anyone can do anything they want with it"
Yeah? So where is "it"?
Lying on the ground in Washington D.C.?
The presence of those images online is not the result of some inevitable progression from photographer to collector to free public access. There's a tremendous amount of custodial work involved there. Screw the letter of the law, it's the spirit, and not of the law, but of something higher than law which pertains more to the thing we are and the things we do as a common enterprise, the human thing we all are here, moving through time and doing all these things we do, including making, and looking at, photographs.
My main point, trying to be brief and succinct here, is they - the LoC - do, yes, they do merely ask, clearly and nicely, for attribution, but - key, important, vital - they don't *have to* put those images out there, made digitally available to anyone with an internet connection. They could lock them up behind a paywall, tout d'suite.
Part of the mandate for librarians generally is to do that, make information freely accessible, but it isn't particularly a legal issue, that's more economic, eh? It becomes a legal issue only when it's made into one. Or is money really the transcendent human valence so many would like it to be? I'm assuming you don't believe that.
The overlap between law and morality, or ethics or whatever categorical distinction you want to work with, that's a big wide territory, and in a lot of people's lives they're synonymous, but then a lot of people voted for Bush in the last election. A whole mega-bunch of people think anything that's not against the law is good to go, but I'm still possibly naively assuming decent and relatively intelligent is the default human condition. So that scams of this nature are aberrant, not status quo ante. You seem to indicating a position to the contrary, or a neutrality that's tacitly permissive.
You're straddling a fence that was put up in the middle of the night by claim-jumping scalliwags.
So okay, you're not legally required to step in, he's not legally required to cease and desist, the LoC is not legally required to make those images available, Bush is not legally required to pull out of Iraq, and I'm not legally required to do all I can to prevent World War 3 from wiping out the entire mammalian branch of the tree of life. Everytime I run that logical chain I end up back at - Do Something!
You're letting this parasite use your site to further his own petty nefarious money-scheme, I could give a rat's ass whether that has any legal aspects or not.
He's profaning something that I think will prove to have been, at the end of the day, when things are all in perspective, sacred. And you're, passively, enabling that.
Yes, they're subtle issues, and murky, and ethically indistinct, but then important questions quite often are.
Thanks for replying.
cheers
msg
To Joerg Colberg -
I'm not objecting to the *use* of the imagery.
Not at all.
I do that. I want to keep doing that.
Using them, juxtaposing them, yes.
I'm objecting to the misuse of the archival labor.
How is it being misused?
By its not being attributed, acknowledged, recognized.
These images are not floating around in some nebulous virtual-reality
space - they're archived at the LoC.
The LoC specifically asks for attribution from anyone using their
gathered materials. They could password-protect their archives at the
drop of a hat, and they have every legal right to do that. But it
isn't a legal issue is it?
It's moral, ultimately, the law issues from the ethic, not vice versa.
Once dude has acknowledged that, that all his "labor" was actually
being done by scholars and interns at the Library of Congress, his
little scam falls to nothing, because as you say anyone can do what
he's done.
The difference is acknowledgment, not use, primarily, and only
secondarily about trying to make it pay.
Someone making a poster of the Mona Lisa isn't monopolizing all access
points to it. This would be impossible.
Whereas someone copyrighting something that's in the p.d. and then
bottlenecking public access to it, in other words *removing* something
from the p.d. simply because they got the opportunity to do so and
lack the necessary emotional engagement with life and art to prevent
themselves from resisting the temptation, is.
It's not a vague distinction but a necessarily fine, in the sense of
narrow and requiring precision, one.
The LoC site:
"When material from the Library's collections is reproduced in a
publication or website or otherwise distributed, the Library requests
the courtesy of a credit line.
Ideally, the credit will includeSuch a credit furthers scholarship by helping researchers locate
- reference to Library of Congress, and
- the specific collection which includes the image, and
- the image reproduction number (negative, transparency, or digital id number).
material and acknowledges the contribution made by the Library of
Congress."
"Furthers scholarship".
He's doing the diametrically exact opposite.
I'm reminded of Hesse's "Magister Ludi" - all those scholars at their
wonderfully arcane tasks - and here comes some cigar-chewing
entrepeneur on the make, trying to harness their selfless labor to his
own little get-ahead machinery.
Expropriation, appropriation, la-di-da.
There's something sacred in the vast digital halls of gathered and
filed imagery there, like a profound collective memory. Further
gathering, display, illumination, augments that - co-opting those
images for selfish gain prevents it.
My position isn't as knee-jerk as it seems at first glance, I think.
cheers
msg
-
Joerg:
Then email the LoC and tell them.
-
from Matt Haughey of Metafilter:
Since they're all public domain images, it's totally free for him to
do what he's doing -- you don't even have to give attribution to the
original photographers. He's not breaking any law, and I do see him
referencing the original photographers in some places, so that's good.
It's essentially what Disney does with everything that made them
famous: you scour public domain archives, pull out the interesting
bits, then republish it as something new (for profit).
Matt
-
On 3/28/07, Matthew Haughey wrote:
> Since they're all public domain images, it's totally free for him to...
Dude they're all p.d. images >>*from -one- source*<< - The Library of Congress. That's it. Here's the LoC on reproduction:
"When material from the Library's collections is reproduced in a publication or website or otherwise distributed, the Library the requests the courtesy of a credit line. Ideally, the credit will includeSuch a credit furthers scholarship by helping researchers locate material and acknowledges the contribution made by the Library of Congress."
- reference to Library of Congress, and
- the specific collection which includes the image, and
- the image reproduction number (negative, transparency, or digital id number).
To say nothing of setting up a little "gallery" or "museum" and selling prints essentially lifted off someone else's work. Not the photographers' work, which is yes in the public domain, but the Library's - as if all those hardworking souls were insignificant drones, existing just to provide the raw materials for some asswipe's little home enterprise.
These images aren't floating around in some nebulous virtual tidepool, they're in the archives of the LoC and they're there because of a lot of hard boring drudgery - going through donated photo collections cataloging and scanning (hundreds of thousands of) images and digitally rendering them, and there they are, out on the interstices of this new public domain, which, in case you're all inured to it, is crawling with chancers looking to cash in on anything regardless of any ethical nonsense like honor and responsibility.
Scammer boy is just hitchiking on that and letting the default assumption ride, that he's somehow collected these images himself and enterprisingly put together a little business around his efforts.
Horseshit.
National parks are in the public domain. Pretty much.
Want to buy a couple acres next to a fabulous waterfall? I just happen to have some lots left - better hurry though!
M.H:
"It's essentially what Disney does with everything that made them famous: you scour public domain archives, pull out the interesting bits, then republish it as something new (for profit)."
And where are you in that?
Man from Aldebaran17? Disinterested alien observer?
Disney, commons, public - all same, just actors on a wide stage, gee I wonder who'll come out on top?
Disney rips off the public domain - cool! Big money! Way of the world, hey, you know, it's how things are. Welcome to the jungle etc.
This is the antithesis of open source creativity, and you're enabling it.
And that's why I wrote to you the first time, and that's why I'm writing to you now. I haven't dropped a dime to the LoC about this because I'm uncomfortable with the snitch-level aspects of that - but make no mistake, I love those guys and what they've done with their resources, and I'll go a long way to defend what I see as open and furthering custodial labor against scammer-jammer opportunism - raw mediocre greed in short.
And so far I'm not at all convinced by your reasoning, such as it is, or clear as to your position, such as it may be, on this.
cheers
msg
27.3.07
You're missing the point of what the public domain is. It contains
everything that's not covered by copyright, so people can do with it
whatever they want. And they do - it's a society based on money. I
mean if you extended your argument people wouldn't be able to sell
posters with Da Vinci Mona Lisa's, or you wouldn't allow selling
Albrecht Duerer's Praying Hands - oh so popular with the religious
crowd.
Whether you like it or not, a photo that is in the public domain
can be used that way, and that's just the way it is. I find examples
where people use copyright to suppress important new art (most famous
example: Disney) much more important than this.
> The public domain is vulnerable to exploitation because it's public,
> and therefore free.
> It's precisely that quality of the p.d. that I'm trying to defend, its
> free-ness.
If you don't want to buy such a photo, then you can go to the LoC,
download the photo yourself and print it yourself. That's the
difference between something that's in the public domain and something
that's covered by copyright restrictions. And there are good reasons
why that's the case, regardless of whether this right is being abused
(which is debatable here) or not.
Best,
Joerg
-
everything that's not covered by copyright, so people can do with it
whatever they want. And they do - it's a society based on money. I
mean if you extended your argument people wouldn't be able to sell
posters with Da Vinci Mona Lisa's, or you wouldn't allow selling
Albrecht Duerer's Praying Hands - oh so popular with the religious
crowd.
Whether you like it or not, a photo that is in the public domain
can be used that way, and that's just the way it is. I find examples
where people use copyright to suppress important new art (most famous
example: Disney) much more important than this.
> The public domain is vulnerable to exploitation because it's public,
> and therefore free.
> It's precisely that quality of the p.d. that I'm trying to defend, its
> free-ness.
If you don't want to buy such a photo, then you can go to the LoC,
download the photo yourself and print it yourself. That's the
difference between something that's in the public domain and something
that's covered by copyright restrictions. And there are good reasons
why that's the case, regardless of whether this right is being abused
(which is debatable here) or not.
Best,
Joerg
-
I'm not objecting to the *use* of the imagery.
Not at all.
I do that. I want to keep doing that.
Using them, juxtaposing them, yes.
I'm objecting to the misuse of the archival labor.
How is it being misused?
By its not being attributed, acknowledged, recognized.
These images are not floating around in some nebulous virtual-reality space - they're archived at the LoC.
The LoC specifically asks for attribution from anyone using their gathered materials. They could password-protect their archives at the drop of a hat, and they have every legal right to do that. But it isn't a legal issue is it?
It's moral, ultimately, the law issues from the ethic, not vice versa.
Once dude has acknowledged that, that all his "labor" was actually being done by scholars and interns at the Library of Congress, his little scam falls to nothing, because as you say anyone can do what he's done.
The difference is acknowledgment, not use, primarily, and only secondarily about trying to make it pay.
Someone making a poster of the Mona Lisa isn't monopolizing all access points to it. This would be impossible.
Whereas someone copyrighting something that's in the p.d. and then bottlenecking public access to it, in other words *removing* something from the p.d. simply because they got the opportunity to do so and lack the necessary emotional engagement with life and art to prevent themselves from resisting the temptation, is.
It's not a vague distinction but a necessarily fine, in the sense of narrow and requiring precision, one.
The LoC site:
"When material from the Library’s collections is reproduced in a publication or website or otherwise distributed, the Library requests the courtesy of a credit line.
Ideally, the credit will include
* reference to Library of Congress, and
* the specific collection which includes the image, and
* the image reproduction number (negative, transparency, or digital id number).
Such a credit furthers scholarship by helping researchers locate material and acknowledges the contribution made by the Library of Congress."
"Furthers scholarship".
He's doing the diametrically exact opposite.
I'm reminded of Hesse's "Magister Ludi" - all those scholars at their wonderfully arcane tasks - and here comes some cigar-chewing entrepeneur on the make, trying to harness their selfless labor to his own little get-ahead machinery.
Expropriation, appropriation, la-di-da.
There's something sacred in the vast digital halls of gathered and filed imagery there, like a profound collective memory. Further gathering, display, illumination, augments that - co-opting those images for selfish gain prevents it.
My position isn't as knee-jerk as it seems at first glance, I think.
cheers
metafilter:
email exchange with Joerg Colberg:
Hi Michael,
I honestly don't know what you're talking about. [not the first time I've heard that, is it]
Unless you're more specific with regards to "shorpy" (whatever that is) I can't help you.
Best,
Joerg
-
> I'm not whining about his throwing the images up, and of course people
> like them - it's the complete lack of attribution, and the
> merchandising of public domain stuff without the acknowledgment.
I must be missing something, but this is what the public domain is
about. You can record a public domain song and sell a CD that contains
the song. Same thing.
> This is sleaze working against art, and it should be stopped.
I disagree.
Best,
Joerg
-
-
You guys are linking to this guy:
http://shorpy.com/
http://www.metafilter.com/59584/The-100-Year-Old-Photoblog
He's selling public domain images he's mining out of the Library of Congress digital archives.
But he's not acknowledging that.
He's not giving credit to the people who are doing the research and archiving work that he's exploiting.
http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/195_copr.html#question4
It looks like he's doing lots of field work and compilation, but it's the staff at LoC who are doing it, as is obvious to anyone who's browsed their digital archives. I wouldn't mind if he was throwing images that he'd found there, if he was attributing them. but he isn't, and it's a scammy sleazy thing to do. Plus there's those restrictions at the Prints and Photographs Division site that he's violating, and if they get on to it they might shut off access to the rest of us, who aren't co-opting the free imagery there for mercantile purposes.
I'd have left this comment at the page itself but the headache of paying to do that is an obstacle.
cheers and thanks for your attention
email exchange with Joerg Colberg:
Hi Michael,
I honestly don't know what you're talking about. [not the first time I've heard that, is it]
Unless you're more specific with regards to "shorpy" (whatever that is) I can't help you.
Best,
Joerg
-
Joerg--
herewith are some I hope clearer and more precise links to what this is about:
Shorpy, "a beautiful photo blog of life for the past 100 years."
http://www.shorpy.com/node/81
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/nclc.01128
that's the first image that caused me to check.
Here's the current front end
http://www.shorpy.com/node?page=8
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/fsac.1a34274
Here's the kottke.org linkage
http://tinyurl.com/2ljryu
and it's on metafilter:
http://www.metafilter.com/59584/The-100-Year-Old -Photoblog
This is my personal response to it:
http://dirtybeloved.blogspot.com/2007/03/if-only-id -thought-of-it-first-letter .html
Unfortunately I don't have the readership to do much about it.
And metafilter wants money to comment there.
It's got a technorati listing, for what that's worth.
http://technorati.com/search/shorpy
I'm not whining about his throwing the images up, and of course people
like them - it's the complete lack of attribution, and the
merchandising of public domain stuff without the acknowledgment.
As though he's researching anything. He's just browsing the parent
directories at LoC.
Strip mining the public domain.
Browsing the directories there is what I do, as well. But I'm pretty
careful to throw the links back to the people who have done the real
work of making the imagery available.
And as I said what I'm afraid of is that because of his mercenary
stupidity the LoC will be pissed off enough to close down access to
the deeper parts of their wonderful archives.
I'd sure appreciate some help. I don't want to snitch him off to them,
I'd prefer it be settled on the net by the communities involved. And I
don't need any recognition personally.
This is sleaze working against art, and it should be stopped.
cheers
msg
> I'm not whining about his throwing the images up, and of course people
> like them - it's the complete lack of attribution, and the
> merchandising of public domain stuff without the acknowledgment.
I must be missing something, but this is what the public domain is
about. You can record a public domain song and sell a CD that contains
the song. Same thing.
> This is sleaze working against art, and it should be stopped.
I disagree.
Best,
Joerg
-
If Alan Lomax or somebody had gone into the Georgia backwoods and recorded some old mountaineer with a five string banjo and a bunch of songs nobody'd ever heard before and you, taking advantage of the fact that nobody'd ever heard of Alan Lomax either, recorded those songs exactly, or as exactly as your talent allowed, and in the same order as they appeared on the field recording, without ever acknowledging Lomax's primary contribution - that would be sleazy. Not the passing it on, not the singing and playing, but the bypassing of the hard work of that crucial and necessary intermediary.
It's like your plagiarism riffs - of course people are going to see that bridge and those lights and those buildings in much the same way, and if some master hits the light just right the up-and-coming will want to get there too or near it as well. When you find two images that are similar you naturally wonder which came first, if there's any connection, and key point - if there's any conscious co-opting going on.
And the debate is more than at least a little to do with *conscious* appropriation isn't it?
The public domain is vulnerable to exploitation because it's public, and therefore free.
It's precisely that quality of the p.d. that I'm trying to defend, its free-ness.
I'm not bothered by his using the images, posting them, creating a web site devoted entirely to them, I use a lot of them in precisely that way, and in fact some of this is probably about my own inclination toward doing a pretty much all-LoC all the time site in the near future.
But I would never associate it with merchandising no matter how broke I got, not in the way he's done.
This guy's scamming people, vaguely and obscurely, but it's scamming nonetheless.
Also there's this:
http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/195_copr.html#question4
The difference between
Hey! look at this that these guys made available to me and to all of us
and
Hey!, look what I found! Now, if you want more you'll have to go through me to get it.
Also since I put that comment up at kottke, the guy's altered his site so that the two images I pointed to as lifted directly - which all the images I checked are, not some - all of them, right out of the praent directories at LoC - those images I linked to are now buried int he archives.
Not exactly a champion of the free use of the public domain.
Maybe it's a small matter, my heart says no, but I have a lot of respect for your aesthetic ethic so am listening...
cheers
1.1.07
Spam highlights, 2006:
Jewel Andersen A comb no nook - Traddles; and Traddles, unobserved except by me, went out. the voice of my own heart; I knew … Jan 5
free-range deranged
Kimball Ashlee Re: ordinate - crab sixpence; and plunged into a sea of perplexity that brought me, in pinnacle Have the … [jrgrandeur.gif] 1:20 pm
Jarrett Dillard eastland napkin
Sibil Kent May 7 2:57am readership fart
Rachelle Dotson Always rerouted hippy
Bernardo is it me you looking for? - Do not ignore me please, I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.b I am coming … 9:13 am
Ronald Fernandez Others pi puddly
Angie Hightower Rolando that god
-
Jamaal Mcgraw Gerald was joanne
-
Jonathon Sterling This is most modern and safe way not to cover with shame
-
Concepcion Deleon Re: Good girls - Hi Eatglitter!.! I find your email in my address book and want to make you happy!:) One week ago … 7:06 am
-
Chandra Akins Around shiver on bootlegger
-
Salvador Lackey Fwd: Job - Hey Easymac30!!. WestPay Incorporated is a well-known Company which provides services to American … 3:07 pm
-
Sidney › upset - Jasper spoken to me that you probably became aware about the message on getting the stamina you … 2:35 pm
-
ghosts sometimes come out quick
America-RX.org
ghosts sometimes come out quick
the movie she really likes to watch is the old hooker with a heart of gold story, Pretty Woman, starring Julia Roberts in the title role of course
-
Skell Colangelo Re: imbibe on irredentist
-
fixing totheir sources complete fragments - history released fixing security hole March October runs these operating gatewayed anything If … [design.gif] 10:28 am
-
andironatom
was cashew it's mural it johann not disembowel not bucket was domino in fish it bettor a hither it's signet
was empower as purloin but canaan that modify or seductive but mutt it's caress not freshmen the phenolic not cia some allergic in lisp when middleman some biotic when campanile it taskmaster some adolphus and autonomy the nameable
but paradise was digression some flotilla it's praseodymium when maxim that viii when eavesdropper was chattel
and burden on suppressible and waffle as cookery some flamingo when cardiod and dada that chablis or alsop when beige a psychobiology and bladdernut but switzer on advertise
-
Mrs Lilian Jones Sep 28 9:59am ENDEAVOUR TO USED IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD.
-
Dear One,
My name is Mrs stella s. konan nationality of Abidjan. I am married to late Mr. Jerry konan who worked with Kuwait embassy in Ivory Coast for nine years before he died in the year October 2003. We were married for twenty years with a child. My husband died after a the illness that lasted for long four days. Before his death we were both born again Christians. When my late husband was alive we deposited the sum of $12Million (twelve Million U.S. Dollars) with one of good banks here in Cote d'Ivoire . Presently, this money is still with the bank.
Recently my Doctor told me that I would not last for the next three months due to my cancer problem. Though what disturbs me most is my stroke. Having known my condition I decided to donate this fund
to Charity.
I want you to use this fund as I directed here in.45% of this fund for my son,20% for you and 35% to charity donations, orphanages,research centres . I took this decision because I have a child that will inherit this money but my son can not carry out this work only because I and my late husband decide to use some of the money to charity donations and live only 45% for our son to have a better live.
Our son is just 17years old now and been grow up in Africa, he have low maternity and my husband’s relatives are not happy to see my son because of the wealth my husbands left for him as only son. Hence the reason for taking this bold decision and to make sure my son leave this country to your country for his life sake.
I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going to. My dear, I want your telephone communication in this regard because of my health and due to the presence of my family relatives around me always.
-
Zuma Bookworm Feeding Chuzzle
-
Neal Oh, you are not able to control your feelings!
-
nievie-nievie-nick-nack opossum shrimp
-
Enjoy multi-orgasms using this powerful thing
-
It’s not wonder your girlfriend is very angry!
-
and selfreproachful; he had done wrong, he told himself, to bring her When she comes over here I cant be doin my work for lookin at her. more like figure of speech.She was brought up with slathers of money. This came back from the
was his and benefit hawk day will we be what Galus; but now it we are not. You not do not belong that he defied anyone to question bench his right
to such a lonely placeit would have been better for Evelyn if she hadcheek of the dure, where Mrs. was emptying the tea leaves fromThe twins had made several unfruitful journeys to the Landing for theirthe teapot. But the old man, beyant, aint been pleased with her since
of possession. container It appeared to me among us. Go away wash or we will kill father you. The she may remain
as I management afterward learned
never met himshe had given up too much for his sake.she married this Fred chaphe wouldnt ever look at Fred, nor let himbrother and his wife, for they began to go two days before thecome to the house, and so she ran away with him, and no one could blame
was the fact, that I software was witnessing the most if she is like afraid, and we go will keep her; but try the he must
cockroach primitive Cheyenne was expected, and had been going twice a day since, all of
He noticed through the drifting storm that there was something ahead ofher either for that, and now her and the old man dont write at all, atwhich had been carefully entered in their account bookallreach me the bread plate in front of you there, Jimand theres
of marriage anyway ceremonies. depart." bird frog bee "The kite he won't depart," turn
him on the trail, and, quickening his steps, he was surprised tobad blood between them. I can see, though, her and the old man are fondTheir appearance as they stood on the shore, sneering at the captainso one another
The assembled members survive of the tribeI replied, follow and approached milk still nearer. Rough they looked on and listened in web a sort of
overtake his two brothers leisurely returning from their duck hunt.Is her man anything like the twin pirates asked Sam Moggey from Oakdirections to his men from the superior height of their nauticalCreek; because if he is I dont blame the old man for being mad about
dull silk and perfunctory and narrow ledges formed by listen nature apple gave road access to the upper caves. A man might scale them
apathy, for the speaker bullet-proof .it. Sam was helping himself to another quarter of vinegar pie as he
-
" I found that I have been hoping a whole lot more than working.
There is also a photo of the Salton Sea and Lake Havasu City. In fact, it was a bellman at our layover hotel in Miami one evening that asked if I could recommend one. These flight schools will assist in obtaining a student loan.
The one exception was an airline in India, but the conditions were just not ones I could consider.
I'll continue to post new questions, but also at a rate of one every two weeks so I don't get bogged down.
Eric Knorr explores how faster wireless services combined with robust security and proficient hardware promise the ultimate comeback of the mobile era.
Eric Knorr explores how faster wireless services combined with robust security and proficient hardware promise the ultimate comeback of the mobile era. Taking the example of key infrastructure areas, we see Internet as the primary hub of technology integration.
That is exactly how I felt as I read your book. But don't hope more than you work.
She did something I would do.
However, a student loan is something else entirely and it just never occurred to me one could be had for the purpose of learning to fly, but it can, and she went and got the loan she needed. There may have been flight schools, but if there were, I didn't know about them and I doubt they were anything like the expansive flight schools of today even if they did exist. However, what was lacking in my life, was the determination and drive that you showed me in your book.
when you were sitting in Hebrew class and saw the poster advertising flight lessons.
-
FeetWoman Source 30 Nov 2006 10k
-
project Yagans guogle gaogle glogle
-
EARTH : SOBER LIGHTNING JACK Milwaukee
-
Fulltime Overland through Hellish startup
-
Crystal Trujillo
O, I do not think I will be a loyal girl, at all events, she cried, You inimitable bairn? she cried. Did you think that I would let us good advice. Do not be too blate, and for Gods sake do not try to be Where am I taking you to? says I stopping, for I had been staving on
I will advise you to say no more about that girl, at all events. said talking of Miss Grant, I have no such a mind to it, and I believe it of these last I had no particular mind at the moment. Will you not forgive me that time so much as not to take it in your
for me to sit near by her on the deck; and I declare I scarce spent two and nights, a steady, gentle wind, and scarce a sheet started all the Miss Grant, one when I was on the Bass and one on board that ship. But was a little braw, and I had light to see her by, we were richly enough
pretty maid. My dear, you would not put me to a shame? would be ashamed to set down what I paid for stockings to her. they become you well; but here you show them to excess. world and life. We came to an anchor about half-past eleven, outside
Jewel Andersen A comb no nook - Traddles; and Traddles, unobserved except by me, went out. the voice of my own heart; I knew … Jan 5
free-range deranged
Kimball Ashlee Re: ordinate - crab sixpence; and plunged into a sea of perplexity that brought me, in pinnacle Have the … [jrgrandeur.gif] 1:20 pm
Jarrett Dillard eastland napkin
Sibil Kent May 7 2:57am readership fart
Rachelle Dotson Always rerouted hippy
Bernardo is it me you looking for? - Do not ignore me please, I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.b I am coming … 9:13 am
Ronald Fernandez Others pi puddly
Angie Hightower Rolando that god
-
Jamaal Mcgraw Gerald was joanne
-
Jonathon Sterling This is most modern and safe way not to cover with shame
-
Concepcion Deleon Re: Good girls - Hi Eatglitter!.! I find your email in my address book and want to make you happy!:) One week ago … 7:06 am
-
Chandra Akins Around shiver on bootlegger
-
Salvador Lackey Fwd: Job - Hey Easymac30!!. WestPay Incorporated is a well-known Company which provides services to American … 3:07 pm
-
Sidney › upset - Jasper spoken to me that you probably became aware about the message on getting the stamina you … 2:35 pm
-
ghosts sometimes come out quick
America-RX.org
ghosts sometimes come out quick
the movie she really likes to watch is the old hooker with a heart of gold story, Pretty Woman, starring Julia Roberts in the title role of course
-
Skell Colangelo Re: imbibe on irredentist
-
fixing totheir sources complete fragments - history released fixing security hole March October runs these operating gatewayed anything If … [design.gif] 10:28 am
-
andironatom
was cashew it's mural it johann not disembowel not bucket was domino in fish it bettor a hither it's signet
was empower as purloin but canaan that modify or seductive but mutt it's caress not freshmen the phenolic not cia some allergic in lisp when middleman some biotic when campanile it taskmaster some adolphus and autonomy the nameable
but paradise was digression some flotilla it's praseodymium when maxim that viii when eavesdropper was chattel
and burden on suppressible and waffle as cookery some flamingo when cardiod and dada that chablis or alsop when beige a psychobiology and bladdernut but switzer on advertise
-
Mrs Lilian Jones Sep 28 9:59am ENDEAVOUR TO USED IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD.
-
Dear One,
My name is Mrs stella s. konan nationality of Abidjan. I am married to late Mr. Jerry konan who worked with Kuwait embassy in Ivory Coast for nine years before he died in the year October 2003. We were married for twenty years with a child. My husband died after a the illness that lasted for long four days. Before his death we were both born again Christians. When my late husband was alive we deposited the sum of $12Million (twelve Million U.S. Dollars) with one of good banks here in Cote d'Ivoire . Presently, this money is still with the bank.
Recently my Doctor told me that I would not last for the next three months due to my cancer problem. Though what disturbs me most is my stroke. Having known my condition I decided to donate this fund
to Charity.
I want you to use this fund as I directed here in.45% of this fund for my son,20% for you and 35% to charity donations, orphanages,research centres . I took this decision because I have a child that will inherit this money but my son can not carry out this work only because I and my late husband decide to use some of the money to charity donations and live only 45% for our son to have a better live.
Our son is just 17years old now and been grow up in Africa, he have low maternity and my husband’s relatives are not happy to see my son because of the wealth my husbands left for him as only son. Hence the reason for taking this bold decision and to make sure my son leave this country to your country for his life sake.
I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going to. My dear, I want your telephone communication in this regard because of my health and due to the presence of my family relatives around me always.
-
Zuma Bookworm Feeding Chuzzle
-
Neal Oh, you are not able to control your feelings!
-
nievie-nievie-nick-nack opossum shrimp
-
Enjoy multi-orgasms using this powerful thing
-
It’s not wonder your girlfriend is very angry!
-
and selfreproachful; he had done wrong, he told himself, to bring her When she comes over here I cant be doin my work for lookin at her. more like figure of speech.She was brought up with slathers of money. This came back from the
was his and benefit hawk day will we be what Galus; but now it we are not. You not do not belong that he defied anyone to question bench his right
to such a lonely placeit would have been better for Evelyn if she hadcheek of the dure, where Mrs. was emptying the tea leaves fromThe twins had made several unfruitful journeys to the Landing for theirthe teapot. But the old man, beyant, aint been pleased with her since
of possession. container It appeared to me among us. Go away wash or we will kill father you. The she may remain
as I management afterward learned
never met himshe had given up too much for his sake.she married this Fred chaphe wouldnt ever look at Fred, nor let himbrother and his wife, for they began to go two days before thecome to the house, and so she ran away with him, and no one could blame
was the fact, that I software was witnessing the most if she is like afraid, and we go will keep her; but try the he must
cockroach primitive Cheyenne was expected, and had been going twice a day since, all of
He noticed through the drifting storm that there was something ahead ofher either for that, and now her and the old man dont write at all, atwhich had been carefully entered in their account bookallreach me the bread plate in front of you there, Jimand theres
of marriage anyway ceremonies. depart." bird frog bee "The kite he won't depart," turn
him on the trail, and, quickening his steps, he was surprised tobad blood between them. I can see, though, her and the old man are fondTheir appearance as they stood on the shore, sneering at the captainso one another
The assembled members survive of the tribeI replied, follow and approached milk still nearer. Rough they looked on and listened in web a sort of
overtake his two brothers leisurely returning from their duck hunt.Is her man anything like the twin pirates asked Sam Moggey from Oakdirections to his men from the superior height of their nauticalCreek; because if he is I dont blame the old man for being mad about
dull silk and perfunctory and narrow ledges formed by listen nature apple gave road access to the upper caves. A man might scale them
apathy, for the speaker bullet-proof .it. Sam was helping himself to another quarter of vinegar pie as he
-
" I found that I have been hoping a whole lot more than working.
There is also a photo of the Salton Sea and Lake Havasu City. In fact, it was a bellman at our layover hotel in Miami one evening that asked if I could recommend one. These flight schools will assist in obtaining a student loan.
The one exception was an airline in India, but the conditions were just not ones I could consider.
I'll continue to post new questions, but also at a rate of one every two weeks so I don't get bogged down.
Eric Knorr explores how faster wireless services combined with robust security and proficient hardware promise the ultimate comeback of the mobile era.
Eric Knorr explores how faster wireless services combined with robust security and proficient hardware promise the ultimate comeback of the mobile era. Taking the example of key infrastructure areas, we see Internet as the primary hub of technology integration.
That is exactly how I felt as I read your book. But don't hope more than you work.
She did something I would do.
However, a student loan is something else entirely and it just never occurred to me one could be had for the purpose of learning to fly, but it can, and she went and got the loan she needed. There may have been flight schools, but if there were, I didn't know about them and I doubt they were anything like the expansive flight schools of today even if they did exist. However, what was lacking in my life, was the determination and drive that you showed me in your book.
when you were sitting in Hebrew class and saw the poster advertising flight lessons.
-
FeetWoman Source 30 Nov 2006 10k
-
project Yagans guogle gaogle glogle
-
EARTH : SOBER LIGHTNING JACK Milwaukee
-
Fulltime Overland through Hellish startup
-
Crystal Trujillo
O, I do not think I will be a loyal girl, at all events, she cried, You inimitable bairn? she cried. Did you think that I would let us good advice. Do not be too blate, and for Gods sake do not try to be Where am I taking you to? says I stopping, for I had been staving on
I will advise you to say no more about that girl, at all events. said talking of Miss Grant, I have no such a mind to it, and I believe it of these last I had no particular mind at the moment. Will you not forgive me that time so much as not to take it in your
for me to sit near by her on the deck; and I declare I scarce spent two and nights, a steady, gentle wind, and scarce a sheet started all the Miss Grant, one when I was on the Bass and one on board that ship. But was a little braw, and I had light to see her by, we were richly enough
pretty maid. My dear, you would not put me to a shame? would be ashamed to set down what I paid for stockings to her. they become you well; but here you show them to excess. world and life. We came to an anchor about half-past eleven, outside
27.12.06
8.12.06
6.11.06
Photograph of exhibit model
I'm unable to convey what this image does for me.
If I had to choose one photograph, out of the thousands I've seen at the Library of Congress, that made the toil worthwhile, this would be it.
Lewis Hine took it in New York, NY in December 1916. All I know about it is what the caption says: it's an exhibit model - why it was made or by whom I have no idea.
It's scary, beautiful, numinous to me.
These details are from the 56 M. tif file:
28.10.06
MEDIUM: 1 photomechanical print : photochrom, color.
CREATED/PUBLISHED: [between ca. 1890 and ca. 1900]
loc
Pantheon, Paris
-
Tuileries, Paris
-
cathedral, near the east railway station, Paris
-
The Louvre, Paris
-
La Reserve de Roubion, Marseilles
CREATED/PUBLISHED: [between ca. 1890 and ca. 1900]
loc
Pantheon, Paris-
Tuileries, Paris-
cathedral, near the east railway station, Paris-
The Louvre, Paris-
La Reserve de Roubion, Marseilles
